Does Local Media Add Enough Value to Justify a Paywall?

Journal Register and Media News Group One hidden storyline in the Journal Register Company’s bankruptcy filing is the role paywalls will play in the company’s next turnaround attempt. John Paton, the CEO of Digital First Media (JRC’s parent company), stated in 2011 his belief that the market value of journalism is “about zero.” Paradoxically, Paton is in the paywall business, controlling “more newspaper paywalls than just about any other executive,” according to the Columbia Journalism Review.

Paywalls guarding valuable content can work, provided that the content is (a) exclusive and time-sensitive, dampening the value of aggregation; (b) expensive to deliver, as in the case of live video content; or (c) easy to track in the event of theft. Most local media content falls into categories (a) and (c), as it’s easy enough to track infringers of reporting from a single local source.

Is there enough demand for local content, however, to justify a media company’s expense in creating a paywall? Digital advertising can sustain companies with national content coverage, but almost certainly cannot sustain a siloed local media outlet as it transitions from publishing in a tradition format (print, TV, radio) to digital publication. So, local can’t make money on display ads alone. The only way local media can make a profit is either by: (a) going national in coverage and making money on nationally-based digital ad sales; or (b) using a shared technology solution for paywalls. The JRC’s effort at approach (b) hasn’t worked because the demand didn’t exist for exclusive, timely local content. Despite its bankruptcy, the JRC (and its parent, Digital First Media) is in the lead in technological innovation for local media companies, so their effort is likely the best of what a paywall will bring.

The inevitable conclusion? Paywalls only work with either: (a) truly exclusive, coveted, time-sensitive content of a national demand (WSJ, Financial Times); or (b) live content that’s difficult to deliver (video streams of like sports games). Otherwise, the winning approach is display ads, free content, and when the chips are down, a national content approach.

One Reply to “Does Local Media Add Enough Value to Justify a Paywall?”

  1. Hi Mike. This is a great summary of the challenges facing local media. While I agree that paywalls are unlikely to work, I disagree with this statement: “Digital advertising can sustain companies with national content coverage, but almost certainly cannot sustain a siloed local media outlet….”

    We’re currently living in an awkward phase where digital advertising stinks. It hasn’t lived up to the promise of personalized, relevant, engaging and timely. Look at the ads displayed on Facebook and you realize that we have a long way to go – nearly all of mine are for “hot suburban singles” (I’m married) or “boost your testosterone” so maybe I’m just offended by their targeting algorithm.

    Perhaps your word “siloed” is a key distinction. I agree that will be very hard for a locally owned papers to pay for the overhead associated with ad sales reps, billing and serving technology, but there are advertisers willing to pay a premium to be included along with locally targeted content.

    In my opinion, local media outlets are in a great position to maintain an ad supported business model if they can control editorial costs and maintain a sense of community.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s